DPS or Survivability?

   A huge debate is going on right now in Diablo 3. The “end all” stat it seems right now is DPS. You will find people looking for someone with a certain DPS in order to run higher monster powers. Many people boast about how their DPS is over 100k, or even higher. Some Demon Hunters can get their DPS to over 250k if they are out of combat long enough, due to a passive.

            Now, this DPS number is often inflated, as in the case of Demon Hunters, as soon as they get into combat and hit their first enemy, their critical chance drops from 100% to their regular levels. They have a passive ability that every second that they don’t get a critical hit, their critical hit chance goes up. So, as long as they are standing around, it looks better than it actually is. But this is not the point of my post.

            This post is going to take a look into the formula behind survivability and DPS, and decide which is better. If you can deal 100k DPS, but die in 2 seconds, you’re not doing very well. Conversely, you may be able to withstand any kind of damage, but if you can’t kill elites or bosses before their enrage timers go off, you are useless.

            So, it’s kind of obvious to me (and hopefully to you, too) that a balance has to be maintained. But how do we determine which we need? Do we need more all resist, or critical hit chance? Do we need more armor, or critical damage?

            By taking the formula that is used to decide certain things, and then comparing the results, we can see what will be best in our current situations. First off, here are some formula used by the game:

Damage Reduction From Armor = Armor/(50*Enemy Level+Armor)
Damage Resist = Resist/(5*Enemy Level+Resist)

As you can see, the armor and resist scale parallel, with 1 resist being worth 10 armor.

 

As the chart to the left shows, armor (and resistances) has huge diminishing returns. The chart assumes a level 63 enemy.

 

The first 500 armor (50 resist) give 13.7% damage reduction. The second 500 (50) gives only 10.4% damage reduction. At 9500 armor (950 resist) the next 500 (50) only gives .95% damage reduction.

 

Now, don’t get me wrong, stacking armor is never a bad idea. But, stacking it to the exclusion of a stat that might help you out more is a bad idea.

 

 

   The point here is that there is a point where it is pretty much useless to stack more armor. Diablo 3 doesn’t have an armor cap, but with diminishing returns, it would take 25,000,000 armor to equal a 99.99% resistance. Technically speaking, you could never reach 100%, since as one value grows, you are dividing it by another value that grows in proportion. Eventually, you’d round up to 100%, but you’d never truly be there.

   Now, we have DPS. To determine overall DPS as shown on your character sheet, you use the acronym SCRAM. In this example, we’ll use my Barbarian’s numbers (unbuffed).

S = Your damage attribute * .01 + 1    In my case, S = 1996 * .01 + 1 = 20.96

C = Crit Chance * Crit Damage + 1     In my case, C = .2 (20% crit chance) * 1 (100% crit damage) + 1 = 1.2

R = Attacks per second, including any attack speed modifiers.  For me, R = 1.1

A = Average Damage. (Min DMG + Max DMG)/2    For me, A = (1021 + 1515) / 2 = 1268

M = Any damage multipliers from skills, plus 1. I have none, so I am just at 1.

Then, you multiply each value together. My Barbarian:

20.96 * 1.2 * 1.1 *1268 * 1 = 35082 DPS

   So now we know how to find resistances and DPS. But, how do we decide which is better for us? Well, this involves a comparison of current stats to possible future stats. I can’t sit here and say something like “1 armor is equal to 3 DPS” or anything like that, because for you, 1 armor might be worth 17 DPS, or vice versa. If you are stacked on armor, your armor has a lesser value than someone who isn’t.

   So, to figure out which is best for us, we need a common denominator; something to bring these equations together and give them a common ground to compare them, so that we can compare apples to apples instead of apples to oranges. In Diablo 3, and also in many RPG games, this number is the amount of damage that will be dealt to you by a monster throughout the course of a fight.

    There is a long formula to find this number, but we will break it down. But I want to impress you with my formula, so I am going to write it in it’s entirety here:

Enemy DPS * (1 – (armor / (50 * enemy level + armor)) * (1 – (average resist / (5 * enemy level + average resist)) * (Enemy Health / ((Damage Attribute * .01 +1) * (Crit Chance * Crit Damage +1) * Attacks per Second * ((Minimum Damage + Maximum Damage)/2) * Damage Multipliers)) = Total damage done to you

    Basically, this formula is saying that we take the enemy’s DPS adjust it for your resistances, and then multiply it by the amount of time it will be alive. For myself, I have made a spreadsheet that I can put the raw values in, and it will give me a baseline total damage done to me. Then I can tweak the numbers, and change some resistances, and then compare the new results. Then I can tweak other numbers, and compare the results to the previous results, allowing me to decide if I need more resists or more DPS. Here is a screenshot of my current values, in which I used the information of a Dark Thrall from Inferno difficulty. I filled in the yellow areas, and the blue areas auto populated.

The “NET DMG to You:” number is the number we want to reduce. Pretty much, increasing any attribute will reduce this number. As you can see, I inserted the “NET DMG to You” number in the “Base NET DMG” box. Next, I decided to see what happened when I changed my armor to 5,000. And this is the result:

As you can see, the “NET DMG to You” went down to 4687.54. I inserted this number into the “Change with RES”, and the “% Gain” box populated to show a 6.63% increase in efficiency. So, for me, 534 armor would give me 6.63% more efficiency.

Now, I am going to put my armor back where it was, and compare it to a 5% increase in Critical Hit chance. And this is the result:

As you can see here, 5% more critical hit chance brings my “NET DMG to You” down to 4819.76. I plug that in to “Change with DPS”, and the “% Gain” auto populates to a 4% increase of efficiency. So, when you compare the two, you see that 534 armor is worth more to me in my current state than is 5% critical hit chance.

   One thing my spreadsheet is not programmed to do is to take into account the fact that strength also adds to armor. I also have not taken into account that Dexterity adds to dodge chance. So, if you change those numbers, you might have to account for the armor and dodge chances manually.

   So, as you can see, sometimes DPS is not the end all stat. Sometimes, in order to deal more damage, you have to be able to take more damage.

 I wasn't able to embed the spreadsheet in this post, but if someone wants it, just zip me an email at sapperwoody@live.com and I can email it to you.

            - Sapper Woody

Beating a Game

            “I beat the game!” This is an oft heard thing around gamers. “Have you played <insert latest game>?” “Yeah, I beat it three days ago.” Typically, “I beat the game” means “I completed the story.” But, what does it really mean to “beat the game”? Let’s take a look at a few of the meanings of “I beat the game.”

            First, as we said before, many people have come to the conclusion that completing the storyline in a game is beating the game. For these people, it’s more about getting the end rather than the journey itself. But that is how a majority of gamers play. For many, it’s no longer about how amazing the journey is. Rather, it’s how many notches they have on their gamer belt. If this is what you prefer, then by all means play that way. After all, it’s all about doing what you enjoy. However, can one really make the claim that they beat a game if they played it on casual/easy mode? Doesn’t there need to be a certain challenge in order to beat something? If I were to say, “I beat this bottle of water. I drank the whole thing over the course of a day”, people would look at me like I was stupid. If there’s no challenge, then there’s no victory.

            This brings us to another question. What about cheat codes? “I couldn’t beat this part, so I turned on invincibility so I could beat it.” Did you really beat it? In my opinion, using cheat codes is not beating the game. In fact, in my opinion, it is just the opposite; it is admitting defeat to the game. In essence, you are saying, “The game was too hard. I gave up and cheated.” So, if you used cheat codes at any time, you did not beat the game.

            Another meaning of “I beat the game” is “I played through the story on the hardest difficulty setting.” I am almost completely in this camp. For a long time, I was one of those players who played games on the default setting. After all, isn’t that what the game was tuned to? However, just recently, my roommate got me to try any and all games on the hardest difficulty. I am now addicted (I use this term loosely. See the last section) to playing all games on the hardest setting. When I complete a playthrough, I feel a sense of accomplishment again. It’s not just another notch in the gamer belt. It’s a victory. It is a moment to savor. It is a moment when you are standing on the proverbial mountaintop screaming (again, proverbially) “I did it! They threw everything they could at me and yet I accomplished the improbable task against impossible odds in the face of unlikely adversarial conditions!”

            For some, playing on anything harder than the default setting is too much work. Others see it as an addition to playing on the default difficulty to add more replay value. For me, it’s the meat and potatoes of the game. It especially makes me feel great when I beat a game on the hardest whose hardest setting is legen…wait for it…dary!

            Still, for others, “I beat the game” means that they got the highest award in every level. Take my recent post about Twisted Metal, for instance. A friend and I beat it on Hard difficulty. Not good enough for me. I had to beat it on Twisted difficulty. Once we were done with that, we realized that we had gotten Gold in every level except 3. So we felt compelled to get gold in every level. To some, this is beating the game. Achieving the highest standard in each level. Any part of me that is not in the last camp is in this camp. While I don’t feel compelled to beat every level at the highest standard, sometimes I do just for the extra sense of accomplishment.

            Others considered it beating the game if you complete all the achievements. After all, the developer made the game, and decided what achievements to include. So, if you get all the achievements, then you’ve done everything the developers want you to do, right? The neat thing about this thinking is that it includes all of the aforementioned ideas concerning beating the game. About half, if not more, of the achievements in video games are pretty much standard now. Beat a level? Get an achievement. Beat the same level on the hardest difficulty? Get another achievement. Beat the level at the highest standard? Get another achievement.

            Whether you think that getting all the achievements is necessary to truly beat a game or not, no one can argue with the fact that the person with all the achievement did beat the game. He accomplished everything in every camp, plus went back to do little odd jobs to get more. Too much for me, but kudos to the guy who does it.

            Another thing that comes to mind when someone says, “I beat the game” is, “Wow, you beat Triple H?” For those of you who are completely lost right now, that was funny. Triple H is a WWE wrestler, who at one point went by the handle “The Game”. So, when someone says, “I beat the game”…. Ok, hopefully you get it now.

            Lastly, I’ve heard someone say “I beat the game”, and mean that they got over their addiction to video gaming. (World of Warcraft specifically.) Video game addiction isn’t as common as some people would have you believe, but is more common than most people realize. If you are struggling with video game addiction, call somebody. I don’t know who to call, as I don’t think that there is a video game addiction hotline. (I just googled “Video Game Addiction Hotline”. The only things that came up were parodies of addiction hotlines. So, if you’re addicted, you’re out of luck. Cold Turkey, anyone?)

            So, whatever your definition of beating the game is, it really doesn’t matter what others think. As long as you are having fun, that’s what counts. So get out there and play games!

   - Woody

Twisted Metal (PS3) Review

          Back when I was younger, I remember playing Twisted Metal on Sony’s original Playstation. I was enthralled by the death match modes while driving cars. At that time, it was an original concept and not very well emulated by anyone. So, following my current trend of playing remakes and re-releases, I allowed myself to be suckered into playing Twisted Metal as released on the PS3.

          The first thing that needs to be said about this game is that it is not an old release that’s simply been rendered with better graphics. This is a whole new game that pulls from its old roots over ten years ago, and did a complete makeover of the series. If you’ve played the newest Mortal Kombat, you know what I’m talking about. Both games have taken the old story, and updated it, and released a whole new game.

          One of the things that I loved about this game is the offline 2-player co-op gameplay. You can play through the entire campaign by yourself or with a friend. Myself, I come from the school of thought that says that anytime I can play with a friend, it’s preferable to playing by myself. So, me and a buddy grabbed a borrowed PS3 and borrowed the game and started to play.

          My buddy isn’t really a hardcore gamer. But he is your average gamer when it comes to ability. He won’t drag you down in co-op gameplay, but he’s not on the first round of picks for online competitive multiplayer in games. So, we decided to skip the easiest difficulty and play it on the second difficulty, hard. We played for a few hours one night, and then finished it the next morning. Once we had beaten it on hard, we decided to try the “Twisted” difficulty. It took us several hours to beat that difficulty, but when we were done we realized that we had gotten a gold rating on all the maps except three. So we went back and got gold on all maps on the Twisted difficulty.

          The campaign overarching story follows a character named Calypso. Calypso hosts a tournament (again, think Mortal Kombat) where there are different events to play, each one driving a vehicle, and each one ending with you killing off all your opponents. The winner of the tournament gets a single wish granted. Fans of the old series will remember that once the wish is granted, it is in some twisted way that ends up killing the person that made the wish.

          The campaign is split into three sections, each consisting of five events plus a boss event. All three sections happen at the same time chronologically, but you have to complete one person’s story before advancing to the next story. You start off playing as Sweet Tooth, the demonic clown that has become the series’ banner. After completing his story, you become a man with a honorable goal of going back in time to save his father from death. Then, you become a sadistic, insane runway model who has aspirations of being the top model in the world.

          Even though you can not choose your driver in the campaign, you still have the ability to choose the car that you drive. Each car has strengths and weaknesses. Some posses more armor, and are capable of dealing damage by ramming into other cars, but at the expense of speed. Some are quicker, with lighter armor. Others are geared more towards their special weapon’s ability. Probably one of the most unique vehicles to play as is “Talon”, a helicopter who can use a magnet to grab cars, fly high, and then drop them.

          Even though the campaign only consists of 18 matches, don’t expect it to be over quickly. If you actually beat a match, it will take only about 3-5 minutes on average. But don’t expect to beat every match on the first try, especially on the hardest difficulty, and also especially the boss rounds.

          All the rounds in the campaign are not deathmatches either. The deathmatch is a staple of the game, but there are several variations. There is a “cage match” mode in which you must stay in a cage, or lose cumulative time on your grace period. If your grace period runs out, you start taking damage. Your goal is similar to deathmatch; kill your opponents before you die.

          There are a couple races in the game, too. In these levels, every car has a bomb attached to it. Once the first place crosses the finish line, the rest of the cars’ bombs are triggered, killing the other drivers. As you are racing, you may also kill off other drivers with your usual weapons.

          Another mode worthy of noting is the juggernaut modes. There are a few variations, but they basically boil down to one thing. You have a few enemies, and one semi with a trailer called the Juggernaut. The Juggernaut has more health and armor than any other vehicle in the game. Your goal is to kill all the enemies before dying. The unique thing is that every 90 seconds or so, the Juggernaut will spawn another enemy. So, you need to kill the Juggernaut to keep him from spawning more and more enemies.

          After each match, you will be given a ranking based upon the speed in which you beat the match. There are four rankings; gold, silver, bronze, and no award. As an extra challenge there is an achievement for getting all golds, and another for getting all golds on Twisted difficulty.

          The graphics and sound in the game are not breathtaking, but there are more than sufficient. This game isn’t about a beautiful world; it’s about carnage. It’s about killing off other drivers in order to win your place at the top. With that being said, this isn’t a game for kids. There is gore and language throughout the game.

          All in all, it was a fun diversion for a few days. But now that I’ve beaten the hardest difficulty with all gold, there’s not much more to do since I can’t go online out here in Afghanistan.

   - Woody

Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary Review

            Throughout gaming history, there have been several games that have defined the future of gaming. In my opinion, gaming as we know it today started all the way back with Jump Man, who became the character we came to know as Super Mario. Moving forward in time, we come to Zelda, the first game to allow you to save your progress. Games tried to become First Person in the 70s with games like Maze Wars and Spasim. MIDI Maze featured PacMan style gameplay in first person in 1987, and was unique in that it allowed for multiplayer over a MIDI interface. In 1992 Wolfenstein 3D was introduced, and a whole new era of gaming began. Shortly thereafter in 1993, Doom came out, furthering the genre with the ability to play multiplayer. Then, in 1996 Quake hit the market. Finally a game that featured 3D modeling instead of 2D models in a 3D world. That same year, the wildly popular Duke Nukem also came out.

            In 1997, 007: Goldeneye was released for the Nintendo 64. For many people, especially console gamers, this was their first experience with a FPS. The ability to play deathmatches in 4-player split screen was amazing. The next year saw a couple of games released that built upon the FPS idea and took it farther in leaps and bounds. Unreal, whose engine is still used today to design games; and Half-Life, which remained popular well into the next century. In 2000, Perfect Dark was released as the spiritual successor to Goldeneye. I experienced my first co-op campaign in Perfect Dark, and was amazed at the split screen.

            Finally, in 2001, combat evolved. Halo was released for Microsoft’s XBOX, quickly becoming the flagship of the console. Featuring huge levels, an immersive storyline, cut scenes that were unrivaled, and intense gameplay, Halo became a favorite for LAN parties. I remember hooking up several consoles and playing multiplayer deathmatches with friends.

            The Halo universe took off. Originally designed as a RTS, Halo featured a futuristic war in which the covenant (a group of several different types of aliens from different planets brought together by religion) sought to enslave or destroy humanity, who was an affront to their gods. Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo ODST, Halo Reach, and Halo Wars all came about from the original success of Halo: Combat Evolved.

            Move forward in time 10 years, and we have the remastered re-release of Halo: Combat Evolved. Released as Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary, this game is everything that I had hoped for when I played the re-release of 007: Goldeneye. The gameplay is amazingly the same as you charge around killing the Covenant (and eventually the Flood) feeling like you could take on the world with your recharging shields.

            This game brought a whole lot more to the table than just updated graphics, however. Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary incorporates the bonus skulls which have become popular in the Halo series. It also brought the Firefight mode, in which you fight to survive waves of enemies. It updated its multiplayer experience to be on par with other Halo games, allowing for a lot more customization of your avatar and for unlockables. Forge mode has been included as well.

            The game also features a unique ability. By hitting the “back” button (still called “select” by a LOT of people, even though it’s always been “back” on Microsoft consoles) you can have the graphics revert back to what they were 10 years ago. I played with this feature extensively. It was amazing to see the advances made to the game. Grass where there was just a carpet of green, leaves on trees, high resolution textures where there was just matte finish, and updated character skins are all amazing when seen in contrast.

            A little disappointing to me was the voice synchronization. I understand that they used the same track and just updated the graphics, but the timing was still as bad as the original. 10 years ago it was great, but with the advances made today, you think they would have tweaked that. Or, it’s possible that they left that there as a throwback. It really appears as if they updated the graphics, retexturing everything, and left the game as is. This is amazing yet slightly disappointing at the same time.

            Even though Halo: Combat Evolved was the first Halo game released, it is not the first part of the story. To get the full story chronologically you have to play the RTS Halo Wars, set in 2531, or 21 years prior to the events of Halo: Combat Evolved. Next you have to play Halo: Reach, which takes place immediately prior to Halo: Combat Evolved and leads directly into the story.

            Then comes Halo 2 and Halo 3. If you want a little side story, you can play Halo: ODST which technically takes place between Halo 2 and Halo 3, but doesn’t deal with the main story. Instead, you become an elite human soldier called an “Orbital Drop Shock Trooper” (hence the letters ODST) as you explore the city of New Mombasa trying to discover what happened to your teammates.

            Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary follows the story of the original. It begins with the ship “The Pillar of Autumn” just having made a jump through space. We find out in future games that they had just jumped from a planet called Reach, a massive naval base, where the covenant had just wiped everyone out. In this jump, the covenant was able to follow them, and end up boarding the ship. With the destruction of Reach, there is only one Spartan left. Enter Master Chief Petty Officer John – 117, known affectionately simply as Master Chief.

            Coming out of the jump, the Pillar of Autumn is close to a massive ring known only as a Halo, where the series gets its title. In the first level, you are tasked with the care of Cortana, an AI that gets implanted into your helmet. You fight your way through the ship to the escape pods, where you escape to the surface of Halo. Once there, you try and find out the secret of this huge ring, and end up discovering that it is a huge weapon of some kind. This starts a race against the covenant. The Covenant inadvertently releases the Flood, aliens who inhabit the bodies of others. You find out that Halo is a weapon designed to wipe out all sentient life in the galaxy, and thus stop the spread of the Flood. You end up destroying Halo, and in a memorable last level are outrunning explosions in a Warthog, and amazing dune buggy type vehicle.

            Playing this game was a fun blast back into the past. With the updated graphics, it also allows you to play the games in chronological order without feeling like you are taking a step back in time. Even though I had beaten Halo: Combat Evolved, I had to beat Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary because Bungie included achievements this time around.

            Playing this game made me look forward to the release of Halo 4-6, the “Reclaiming Trilogy” which promises to be even more of the action game that we all love, and finish out the story.

   - Sapper Woody

Prototype 2 in Review

   I picked up Prototype 2 on the recommendation of a friend, having never played Prototype 1 before. One of my main concerns with picking up a sequel without having first played the original is coming into a story without knowing the background of what is going on. Fortunately, in Prototype 2, there is a video that will give a synopsis of the first game, and it brought me up to speed.

   Prototype 2 takes cues from a host of other games. Basically, there was a viral outbreak that infected a whole city. Most people that get infected generally become zombie-like in nature, although some exhibit super-human abilities.

   The virus has been developed by Gentek, in conjunction with the paramilitary group Blackwatch. In the story leading up to Prototype 2, Alex Mercer has been blamed for the release of the virus. In the second game, you play as Sergeant James Heller, a soldier who blames Mercer for the loss of his wife and daughter to the virus. In the opening sequences, you confront Mercer only to be infected yourself and develop some rudimentary powers.

   Throughout gameplay, you gather new powers from enemies by “consuming” them. You also get the chance to upgrade your existing powers the same way. Upon completion of certain objectives you can gain new mutations, which help you to travel, hunt down enemies, or make some encounters easier.

   This game is very reminiscent of Spiderman 2 in its gameplay. Being able to jump very high (extremely high later on), being able to run along and up walls, and being able to glide for a while make the free roaming sections feel almost the exact same as Spiderman 2 with better graphics and in a different setting. Traveling the city is actually fun in and of itself, and can be rewarding with collectibles that will upgrade your powers.

   Missions throughout the game get a tad bit repetitive, but since you are having fun you don’t notice so much. Missions basically fall into a few categories: sneak into a facility to kill someone, hunt someone down, clear out an instance, or gather boxes dropped from helicopters before they can be recovered by Gentek or Blackwatch.

   Along the way, it becomes unclear who the “bad guys” are. There are several twists in the story that keep you guessing as to who is really trying to save the city, who is trying to pull a political maneuver, who is trying to create an “evolved” army, or if everyone is just self serving. Because of a betrayal, you are constantly on your guard from anyone who tries to aid you in the game.

   The game deals pretty well graphically. You aren’t blown away by amazing scenery as you spend all your time in a war-torn, zombie-infected city. But the attention to detail is there and you’ll notice is subconsciously. There are a host of different character models for all the different infected humans roaming around, and at times I estimated that there were at least 50 on my screen at once.

   The enemies that you actually fight do get a bit repetitive as well, but again you are having fun so you don’t notice it too much. The killing animations are pretty varied, so even though you are fighting the same enemies time and again, each fight has its own feel to it.

   The sound in the game is decent. Nothing stands out, but then again nothing feels out of place. The voice acting is pretty good, and I didn’t notice any lip-syncing being off. But then again, most of the time someone is talking they have a helmet on. But even in the times when they didn’t have something covering their face, it was spot on.

          The controls are natural feeling. It is easy to get the hang of running up a building, jumping as high as you can, and then gliding. You even get the knack of when to “air dash” to renew your glide time, and you can’t simply fly forever. Combat flows naturally, and is often a hectic time as you are fighting infected and Blackwatch at the same time. It is not uncommon to have a dozen or so Blackwatch shooting at you, while having a helicopter or two overhead, and still fighting a half a dozen infected. Even with all this, it still flows naturally. I really have to tip my hat to the designers on that one.

   The game overall is a blast to play. I found myself playing for hours on end and not even realizing how long I’d been playing. I am now longing for a third release, and am contemplating going back and playing the first.

   - Woody

Gears of War 3 Horde Mode Boss Guide

    Seeing as some of the traffic to my website was being generated by people googling “Gears of War 3 Horde Mode” or variations of it, I figured I’d better post this sooner, rather than later.

   We will be discussing how to beat all the bosses in GoW3 Horde Mode, and handling each boss specifically. But first, a little overall advice: clear out the wave first if you can. The bosses all become very easy to kill if you can clear out all the “little” guys. The word “little” is in apostrophes, because more often than not, bosses are accompanied by the big hitters: boomers, maulers, grinders, and kantus. I will be posting another guide on all the “little” guys, but as a rule of thumb, kill them all first.

   You will need to learn how to kite, if you don’t already know. You can read about how to kite here. Also, this guide will be how to kill these bosses by yourself. If you have friends, this whole process becomes even easier.

   Now, on to the bosses!

   Berserkers: Berserkers can be tough. However, they are very dumb, and only utilize melee. The easiest strategy to beating a berserker is to use a scorcher (flame thrower) on him. He will cover his face and stumble around for a few seconds while on fire, and becomes more vulnerable to bullets while in this state. Once he goes back to normal, simply use the scorcher on him again. Rinse, repeat.

   Always keep an obstacle between you and the berserker if possible. This makes his charges easy to avoid, as he’ll charge right into the obstacle. If you can’t keep an obstacle between you, it’s still pretty simple to just roll out of the way when he charges.

   Lambent Berserkers: The lambent berserkers are easily the hardest enemy to beat. This is because they are only susceptible to weapons when they are about to charge or jump, or right after charging or jumping. They also only utilize melee, and so the kiting tactic works with them.

   They have a yellow/gold area on their chest that is their only weak spot. Unfortunately, this is covered by bone unless they are attacking, as I said above. The best way to beat them is to have quick reflexes. Let them get close enough to charge, and that spot will open up for a second. Do enough damage and it will stop their charge, making them stagger for a few seconds while still vulnerable in their chest.

   If you don’t do enough damage to stop their charge (or just want to play it safer), then roll out of the way while they charge, and then shoot the open area while they recover from the charge. This same tactic will work if they are jumping.

   Savage Corpsers: Savage corpsers take a while to beat, but are pretty easy. Their legs are impervious to weapons, but their head and abdomen are soft spots. They will walk straight towards you, and you can shoot them in the head. When you do this, they will cover their face with their legs, and can’t be hurt in their head (they can still be hurt by shooting their abdomen during this time.

   If you do enough damage by repeating this cycle, they will eventually rear up and scream in pain. You can take this time to unload on them. For this reason, reload anytime they cover their heads, so you’ll have a full magazine to unload into their soft belly.

   If they get too close, simply roll out of the way, and run. They can’t keep up with your sprinting.

   Eventually, they will burrow under the ground. An arm will come up and chop at you, but is easily avoided through rolling and running. After that attack, they will burrow towards you, and rise up suddenly. Dodge this, and the cycle starts over.

   Brumak: This guy’s difficulty depends on the map you are playing. There are some doorways that he can’t get through on some maps, so the strategy is obvious: hide in there.

   For other maps, you’ll have to make sure that you are behind cover. He has two attacks: machine guns mounted on both of his arms, and a rocket launcher mounted on his back that fires multiple rockets in a barrage.

   You will want to pop out of cover in between bursts of machine gun fire and shoot at the guns on his wrists. Eventually they will be destroyed, and he won’t be able to shoot them anymore, and will only have his rocket launcher.

   When he fires a rocket barrage, sometimes simply ducking for cover will work. But about 1/3 of the time, a stray rocket will miss the cover, and hit behind you. This will down you, and possibly kill you outright. The best idea is to have cover in which you can roll left or right, and dodge the rockets altogether.

   Once his machine guns are down, you can pretty much shoot him wherever. Some guides say to shoot his rocket launcher next. But in my experience, once you down the launcher, he is dead anyway. So just kill him.

   Reavers: When my friends as I see reavers, we get excited, as this is arguably the easiest boss in the game. They have two attacks: machine gun fire and a single rocket attack. The easiest way to beat them is simply to hide behind cover and shoot them. They are basically a mix between grinders and boomers. Their height does give them some advantage, as they can shoot over some lower obstacles, so beware of that.

   Also, the designers knew these guys were easy to kill. This means that if they show up as a boss, you can expect to fight 2-3 of them at a time, and about 5-6 total on that wave.

   They are also an exception to the rule about killings adds first. They are so easy, that you can include them in your killing plan.

   Gunkers: Gunkers can shoot at you from across the map. While not the toughest enemies, they can be the hardest, depending on the map and your base setup. When in close, they can also shoot out an arm that will down or possible outright kill you.

   If you are in an open area, you’ll have to do a lot of rolling around to avoid their ranges attack, which does splash damage. If you are in an area that that has an enclosed structure, sometimes you can get them stuck on an obstacle where they can’t get close enough to you to melee, and they ranged attack hits the ceiling before getting to you.

   If you can’t do this however, you’ll need to shoot and dodge, like stated above. This enemy is annoying, but not necessarily hard. It gets really tedious if you have two of them on the map at the same time. Hopefully you can get them to fire simultaneously, and so avoid both shots at once. The good news is, their shots have a high arc, so you can see it coming from pretty far away, and have time to dodge.

   Well, get out there and beat some bosses!

   - Woody

Another Milestone!

Well, to see where I was on google's imprtance list, I googled the word "Sapper". Imagine my surprise when about halfway down, where it shows "images for sapper", I found that the first 4 pics to be of my run with my hunter through Molten Core! So, I hit the "images" button, and the first row are more pics of my run.

Now, google might just know that I put those pics there, and so it is showing me my pics. But I'd like to think that I am moving up in the world.

   - Woody